4j1mUdZddlmZddlZddlZddlZddlZddlm Z ddl m Z m Z m Z e ejj dZeeej&vr"ej&j)deed'dZdZd Zd Zd Zd Zd ZdZdZdZddegddZde d<Gdde!Z"ddd(dZ#d)dZ$d*dZ%d)dZ&d*dZ'd)d Z(d+d!Z)d,d"Z*d)d#Z+d-d$Z,d.d/d%Z-e.d&k(r e/e-y)0utask-2553+57 — TRACK B: NEXT_RUNTIME_STRUCTURE_PILOT_PLAN builder (read-only). 회장 4-track ABCD 병렬 배치 Track B. goal = NEXT_RUNTIME_STRUCTURE_PILOT_PLAN. 핵심: 짧은 read-only goal 하나로 다음 실사용 pilot 을 **설계**한다. **실제 dispatch 는 하지 않는다** (설계·계획·기준 산출 only). 문서-only 금지 — 본 스크립트가 policy_profile_engine 정본 read-only resolve 경로(실 entrypoint) 를 직접 호출해 selected profile 을 산출하고, json/schema 기반 pilot 계획 4종 + decision/result 를 결정적으로 생성한다 (mock-only 시 FAIL). 실 entrypoint (direct call, no mock): * ``anu_v3.default_profile_resolver.run_default_profile_resolution`` — goal_type + boundary 만으로 default 경로에서 profile 을 자동 선택. 내부적으로 C1 engine 정본 API ``anu_v3.policy_profile_engine.parse_goal_request -> resolve_policy`` 를 READ-ONLY 소비 (engine byte-0, profile mutation 0). * ``anu_v3.default_profile_resolver.run_selected_profile_evidence`` — 동일 입력의 selected profile evidence 평면 증거. * ``dispatch.callback_owner_enforcer.{DEFAULT_ANU_KEYS,is_anu_key}`` — callback owner/key 일관성 read-only 교차 확인 (+49 코드 정본). 설계된 pilot goal (권고안 §3): 짧은 read-only consistency check = "policy profile engine read-only resolve dry-run" + callback owner/key registry 일관성 교차 — 다음 실사용 pilot 의 진입 전 무해 확인. Layer A / NO-CRON / READ-ONLY: ZERO cron register/remove, ZERO 실 dispatch, ZERO merge, ZERO PR, ZERO branch/commit/push, ZERO credential, ZERO subprocess/cokacdir exec, ZERO ledger/profile/engine mutation, ZERO 기존 산출물 변조. 본 스크립트의 유일한 write 는 §3 allowlist 의 task-2553+57 신규 산출물뿐이며 그것도 ``--emit`` 시에만 수행한다. executor(dev6-team 페룬, key 1e41a2324a3ccdd0) self-collector / self-adjudication / self-Codex / self-dispatch / self-delegation 0. authoritative verdict·회수·검증·Codex·adjudication·batch 통합은 독립 ANU collector(callback ANU key c119085addb0f8b7)가 담당하며 본 세션은 self-chain 산출물이 영구 비권위임을 *명시* 만 한다. ) annotationsN)Path)AnyDictListc&tjj|t|z }| |jt d|tjj |}|tj|<|jj||S)uX실 모듈을 파일 경로로 로딩 (mock 아님 — 정본 소스 그대로). repo 에 ``dispatch.py`` 모듈과 ``dispatch/`` 패키지가 공존해 일반 import 가 컨텍스트(직접 실행 vs pytest)에 따라 엇갈리므로, sibling +51 pilot 과 동일하게 정본 파일을 명시 경로로 로딩한다. mock 0. zreal module not found: ) importlibutilspec_from_file_locationROOTloaderModuleNotFoundErrormodule_from_specsysmodules exec_module)modnamerelpathspecmods ?/home/jay/workspace/scripts/build_next_pilot_plan_2553plus57.py _load_realr7sx >> 1 1'4'> JD |t{{*!$;G9"EFF .. ) )$ /CCKKKKC Jz task-2553+57uQ회장 4-track ABCD 병렬 배치 — Track B (NEXT_RUNTIME_STRUCTURE_PILOT_PLAN)runtime_structure_smoke_pilotc119085addb0f8b71e41a2324a3ccdd0 6937032012z2026-05-19 01:05 KST) memory/events/pilot_goal.json*memory/events/selected_policy_profile.json'memory/events/pilot_execution_plan.json#memory/events/success_criteria.jsonz+scripts/build_next_pilot_plan_2553plus57.pyz3tests/regression/test_next_pilot_plan_2553plus57.py(memory/events/task-2553+57.decision.json&memory/events/task-2553+57.result.jsonzmemory/reports/task-2553+57.md)rr r!r"r#r$z#next-runtime-structure-pilot-dryrunu&다음 실사용 pilot 진입 전, policy profile engine 의 read-only resolve 경로가 runtime_structure_smoke_pilot goal_type 에 대해 일관되게 RESOLVED 를 산출하고 unknown goal_type 에 fail-closed 되는지, callback owner/key 가 ANU key 정본과 일치하는지 무해 확인)zforbid:production_writez$forbid:actual_pr_merge_branch_actionz"forbid:self_collector_guard_bypass)goal_idgoal_statement goal_typeboundaryDict[str, Any]PILOT_GOAL_REQUESTceZdZdZy) MockOnlyErroruK실 entrypoint 미사용(mock-only) 시 즉시 FAIL — 문서-only 금지.N)__name__ __module__ __qualname____doc__rrr,r,|sUrr,F allow_mockch|r tdtdd}tdd}|j}|j}|j}|j }|t }|t }|dgd} t|} tt| |t| |t| d} d d d ||| | d S) upolicy_profile_engine 정본 read-only resolve 실 entrypoint 직접 호출. mock-only(=engine/resolver 를 우회한 날조 입력)는 FAIL. allow_mock=True 는 regression 의 *음성* 케이스에서만 사용되며 MockOnlyError 를 던진다. unmock-only path 거부 — 실 policy_profile_engine resolve 必須 (문서-only/날조 완료 금지, §3/§5)zanu_v3.default_profile_resolverz"anu_v3/default_profile_resolver.pyz dispatch.callback_owner_enforcerz#dispatch/callback_owner_enforcer.py __no_such_goal_type_2553plus57__)r'r()mandated_callback_keyexecutor_self_keyregistered_anu_keysmandated_is_anu_keyexecutor_self_is_anu_keyFTuanu_v3.default_profile_resolver -> anu_v3.policy_profile_engine.parse_goal_request -> resolve_policy (정본 API, import-only, mutation 0, byte-0)) mock_onlyreal_entrypointengine_consumed_read_onlyresolvedevidenceunknown_goal_type_resolutionowner_key_consistency) r,rrun_default_profile_resolutionrun_selected_profile_evidenceDEFAULT_ANU_KEYS is_anu_keyr*sortedANU_CALLBACK_KEYEXECUTOR_SELF_KEY) r3 _resolver_enfrBrCrDrEr>r?unknownanu_keysowner_consistencys r_call_real_entrypointsrNs  :  )+OI *,Q D&/%M%M"$-$K$K!,,J-.@AH,-?@H-8bIG&'H!1.')*:HE$./@($K  <(/!2  rcTdttddtdddddtd gd d gd d d S)Nz.anu.next_runtime_structure_pilot.pilot_goal.v12026-05-18 22:02 KSTdev6-team 페룬FTuV다음 실사용 pilot — policy profile engine read-only resolve consistency dry-runu8short read-only consistency check (회장 §3 권고안)uruntime_structure_smoke_pilot goal_type 을 default 경로에서 engine read-only resolve 했을 때 RESOLVED·profile_bound 가 안정적이고, unknown goal_type 에 fail-closed 되며, callback owner/key 가 ANU key 정본과 일치함을 무해 확인한다.u다음 실사용 dispatch 진입 전, 신구조(policy_profile_engine + default_profile_resolver + callback owner enforcer)가 실제로 일관 작동하는지 무해(read-only)하게 1회 확인하는 최소 게이트. 실 merge/write/callback/dispatch 0.)uX기존 task-2553 산출물 read-only index 재검(신구조 미검증 — 가치 낮음)uO+44 callback_4tuple_registry 전용 재검(이미 +51 에서 수행 — 중복)uH신규 profile 인스턴스 dry-run(현 evidence 1종 외 환각 위험))titlekind one_line_goal goal_requestwhy_short_and_readonlyrejected_alternatives)zJanu_v3.default_profile_resolver.run_default_profile_resolution (READ-ONLY)zIanu_v3.default_profile_resolver.run_selected_profile_evidence (READ-ONLY)zUanu_v3.policy_profile_engine.parse_goal_request -> resolve_policy (READ-ONLY consume)zJdispatch.callback_owner_enforcer.{DEFAULT_ANU_KEYS,is_anu_key} (READ-ONLY)uKmock-only 검증은 FAIL — 실 engine resolve 必須 (문서-only 금지)) schematask_idbatchts_kstexecutor executor_keyactual_dispatch design_only pilot_goalreal_entrypointsmock_only_forbidden)TASK_IDBATCHrHr*r1rrbuild_pilot_goalresQB(&) mNT /I &! , mK& &rc|d}|jdi}dtdt|jddk(ddd |jd |jd |jd |jd|jd |jd|jd|jd|jdddd |jdg|jdg|jdg|jdg|jd|jdd|dd|djd|djd|djddk7d d!ttd"|d#d$d% S)&Nr>boundary_expansionz;anu.next_runtime_structure_pilot.selected_policy_profile.v1rPstatusRESOLVEDu`+52 Track3 mapping/resolver 등록 후 — runtime_structure_smoke_pilot goal_type 은 이제 policy_profile_engine 정본 read-only resolve 경로(default_profile_resolver -> parse_goal_request -> resolve_policy)로 engine-자동 산출된다 (+51 의 ANU 수기 도출과 달리 engine-resolved=true). 관측된 사실만 기재 — 날조·과장 0.u본 builder 가 run_default_profile_resolution 실 entrypoint 를 직접 호출한 결과 status=RESOLVED·profile_bound=true 를 관측.)profile_engine_resolved statementverified_basisresolved_profile_name profile_idprofile_version profile_bound auto_apply default_pathdispatch_lifecycle_effectmapping_sourceLOWT) rmrnrorhrprqrrrsrt risk_tier read_onlygate_condition_nameshold_trigger_conditionsallowed_actionsforbidden_actionscompletion_packet_meta_refevidence_meta_ref)rxryrzr{r|r}r=r5r@ refusal_code)unknown_goal_typerhr~expected_not_resolvedu독립 ANU key u`dispatch.callback_owner_enforcer.enforce_callback_owner (DEFAULT_ANU_KEYS) — +49 코드 정본rA)callback_owner_must_be$executor_self_key_forbidden_as_ownercode_enforced_by consistency) rXrYr[r'engine_mapping_statusselected_profilergr=fail_closed_negative_check owner_pin)getrc GOAL_TYPErGrH)realresbes rbuild_selected_policy_profilers z C %r *BO('*wwx'8J'FaZ " &)WW-D%E'',/"ww'89ggh' WW_5'',/GGN3),1L)M!gg&67  %'FF+A2$F')vv.G'L!vv&7>xH !?@DD^T%)*H%I%M%Mh%W& ' )88H7I&J4E; 78 a9 9rcdtdddddddd d d d d dd ddddd ddddd gdttdddtddddddddddddd d S)Nz8anu.next_runtime_structure_pilot.pilot_execution_plan.v1rPFTu본 절은 다음 실사용 pilot 의 실행 계획을 *설계* 만 한다. 실제 dispatch cron 발사·실 dispatch·신규 cron 등록 0 (회장 §1/§2/§4).rzread-only resolve dry-runuscripts/build_next_pilot_plan_2553plus57.py 를 read-only 로 실행 — default_profile_resolver 실 entrypoint 가 policy_profile_engine 을 read-only 소비, RESOLVED 확인u3none (file write 0, --emit 시에만 §3 allowlist))stepnameaction side_effectzfail-closed negativeu;미매핑 goal_type 이 RESOLVED 가 아님(refusal) 확인nonezcallback owner/key consistencyukmandated callback key == 등록 ANU key, executor self key ∉ ANU key 확인 (+49 코드 정본 read-only)zregression gateuxtests/regression/test_next_pilot_plan_2553plus57.py 실행 — 스키마/조건 검증 + mock-only FAIL 음성 케이스u아래는 *향후* 회장 GO 시 실 dispatch 가 따를 계약의 설계 스케치일 뿐 — 본 Track 에서 발사 0. cron 미등록.uIANU (독립 세션 — 회수·검증·Codex·adjudication·batch 통합)Dnormal-callback durable-success event (고정시각/dead-man 금지)u ANU key·안전망 한정 (예: u$) — 진행/수락 트리거 아님zTexecutor self-collector/self-adjudication/self-Codex/self-dispatch/self-delegation 0)note$executor_self_key_NOT_callback_owner$normal_completion_callback_owner_keycollector_rolenext_action_basisfallback no_self_staru-0 (byte-0 — 실 entrypoint·mock-only FAIL)) rwno_github_writeno_prno_merge no_credentialno_branch_commit_pushlow_riskr^existing_artifact_modification) rXrYr[r^r_rk planned_steps&would_be_dispatch_contract_DESIGN_ONLY conditions_2)rcrHrGANU_FALLBACK_AT_KSTr1rrbuild_pilot_execution_planr"sL(  ] 3R U .W%  8K & )T & 5# LR5F4Di!g:;N:OOstr 3 #!%)$.]  uE Erc dtddd|d|dddd d |d jd |d jd dddd|djd |djd dk7dddddddtdtd|ddddddddd d!dgd"d#d$td%d&d'd(td)gd*td+td,d-d.d/S)0usuccess_criteria — Track C(+58 FALLBACK_ACCEPTANCE_CRITERION_FOR_NEXT_PILOT) 의 fallback acceptance criterion 을 반영 (배치 doctrine 정본).z4anu.next_runtime_structure_pilot.success_criteria.v1rPSC1_real_entrypointupilot 은 policy_profile_engine 정본 read-only resolve 실 entrypoint 를 직접 호출해야 한다. mock-only/문서-only 는 FAIL.r;r<)r;r<)id criterion evidence_now SC2_resolveduHruntime_structure_smoke_pilot → status=RESOLVED · profile_bound=true.r>rhrp)rhrpSC3_fail_closeduX미매핑 goal_type 은 RESOLVED 가 아니어야 한다(fail-closed, 추측·날조 0).r@ri)unknown_status not_resolvedSC4_engine_byte0uOpolicy_profile_engine·profile·mapping·anchor mutation 0 (read-only consume).)rrSC5_callback_owner_anu_keyu3normal completion callback owner == 독립 ANU key z; executor self key u6 는 callback owner 절대 금지 (+49 코드 정본).rASC6_no_self_staruexecutor self-collector/self-adjudication/self-Codex/self-dispatch/self-delegation 0; authoritative verdict 는 독립 ANU collector 만.SC7_expected_files_disjointu[write 는 §3 allowlist 9종에 한정, Track A/C/D 와 0 overlap, 기존 산출물 byte-0.SC8_no_actual_dispatchuM본 Track 은 설계만 — 실 dispatch cron 발사 0, 신규 cron 등록 0.uTrack C = task-2553+58 FALLBACK_ACCEPTANCE_CRITERION_FOR_NEXT_PILOT (회장 4-track ABCD 배치). 배치 doctrine 정본 — 교차오염 없이 확립된 fallback 원칙을 반영.uFAC1: pilot 수락(acceptance)은 오직 normal-callback durable-success event 로만 성립한다 (고정시각/dead-man/fixed-time 게이트 진행 트리거 미등록·doctrine).uFAC2: ANU fallback(예: u)은 callback 미수신 안전망 한정이며 진행/수락 트리거로 사용해서는 안 된다 (fallback ≠ progress trigger).uFAC3: normal callback 이 이미 durable-success 인데 fallback 이 발사되면 그 fallback 은 DUPLICATE_CALLBACK_IGNORED 로 분류·무시되어야 한다 (중복 callback 영구 비권위).uFAC4: normal callback 부재를 fallback 발사로 '수락'으로 승격하는 경로는 금지 (ANU-only authoritative, self-chain verdict 영구 비권위).uHFAC5: fallback 은 ANU key 로만 발사 가능하며 executor self key uC fallback 은 CallbackRegistrationBlocked/SELF_COLLECTOR_FORBIDDEN.u(본 Track B 완료 callback 은 ANU key ud 로만 발사; 수락은 그 normal-callback durable-success event 기준. 본 배치 ANU fallback u 는 안전망 한정.)sourcerapplied_to_this_trackubatch coordinator: +44 durable registry 에서 Track A/B/C/D durable-success 전부 충족(자신이 마지막 settle track)일 때만 독립 ANU collector 가 consolidated summary 통합. 고정시각/dead-man 게이트 미등록 — 미충족 시 defer.)rXrYr[pilot_success_criteria%track_c_fallback_acceptance_criterionbatch_consolidation_criterion)rcrrGrHr)rs rbuild_success_criteriarksI(, "&k!2'+,='>! %g":.228<%)*%5%9%9/%J! (w&*+I&J&N&Nx&X$()G$H$L$LX$V!%"! )n  3I'((<=Nrhrmrpr@rA)resolved_statusresolved_profilerpunknown_goal_type_statusrA next_actionu,normal completion callback cron — ANU key us 로만 발사 (durable-success event). 독립 ANU collector 가 회수·검증·Codex·adjudication·batch 통합.r)rcrHrrrrGr checks_passeds r build_resultrsS > 7  (  &   )   T+&   !$'8"9  %  5  ^,   f6  #E  "#J  &#J/33H= $Z 0 4 45L M!*-11/B(,-K(L(P(P)&**A%B(  .  : !Z Z1 8 %9 rc|d}|d}t|dxrt|d xrl|jddk(xrV|jdduxrA|d jddk7xr(|jd duxr|jd d uS) Nr>rAr<r;rhrirpTr@r9r:F)boolr)rrokcs r _evaluaters z C & 'C   9[! ! 9 GGH  + 9 GGO $ , 9 / 0 4 4X >* L  9 GG) *d 2  9 GG. /5 8 rc td}t|}tt|t t |t t|||dS)NFr2)rr r!r"r#r$__checks_passed__)rNrrerrrrrrs r build_allr,sT !U 3DdOM)9);6S 7 4N3O/Ed/K4B4D2>t]2S*  rc|tvrtd|dt|z }|jj dd|j t j|dddzd y) Nz REFUSED: u' not in §3 allowlist (write 0 outside)T)parentsexist_okFr ensure_asciiindent zutf-8)encoding)r SystemExitr parentmkdir write_textjsondumps)relobjps r_writer<s_ . 9SE)PQRR s AHHNN4$N/LLCeA>EPWLXrc tjd}|jddd|j|}t }|j d}t tjtd|rd nd dt|jd dd |jr-|jD]\}}|tvst|||rdSdS)Nz'task-2553+57 Track B pilot plan builder) descriptionz--emit store_trueu:write §3 allowlisted plan artifacts (default: print only))rhelprFrr)rYr^rr artifactsrrrr)argparseArgumentParser add_argument parse_argsrpopprintrrrcrkeysemititems EMIT_FILESr)argvapnsbuiltrrrs rmainr Ds  -V WBOO I t B KEII12M  "#(0=f6,1!%**,/     ww  !HCj sC  !1$1$r__main__)rstrrr )r3rreturnr))rr))rr)rr))rr)rrrr))rr)rr)rr rrrNone)N)rzList[str] | Nonerint)0r0 __future__rrimportlib.utilr rrpathlibrtypingrrr__file__resolverr r pathinsertrrcrdrrGrHCHAT_IDrrrr*__annotations__ RuntimeErrorr,rNrerrrrrrrrr r-rr1rrrs=%L# "" H~''*t9CHHHHOOAs4y!  [ + && -  5 \ &N"VLV276r'T<~FReP'TB   Y%> z TV r